Super League Basketball (SLB) has officially launched legal action against the British Basketball Federation (BBF), accusing the governing body of abusing its authority and violating UK competition law. The dispute centers around the BBF's refusal to issue governing body endorsements (GBEs), a critical requirement for clubs aiming to sign overseas players who require visas. The SLB claims this decision is a deliberate move to disadvantage its clubs in favor of rival leagues supported by the BBF.

Background of the Dispute

The conflict began when the BBF terminated an interim agreement with the SLB and instead signed a 15-year deal with GBB League Ltd (GBBL) to manage the men's professional league starting from the 2026-27 season. The SLB argues that this decision was made without proper justification and is intended to undermine its operations.

Legal Allegations

The SLB asserts that the BBF's actions could violate the UK Government's code of practice for sports governing bodies. The league has no issue with another league being granted a UK license but insists on operating free from unlawful harm. The SLB also disputes the BBF's claim that it withdrew from the tender process voluntarily, stating that it did so due to concerns over the legality of the BBF's actions.

Implications for the League

The SLB, which was awarded an interim three-year license in July to replace the financially troubled British Basketball League, now faces uncertainty as the BBF has activated a clause to terminate the interim agreement at the end of the 2024-25 season. The SLB's nine clubs have also refused to join any league under the current terms set by the BBF.

Conclusion

This legal battle highlights the ongoing tensions between the SLB and the BBF, with significant implications for the future of professional basketball in the UK. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how sports governing bodies operate and enforce regulations in the future.