Who Benefited the Most from the $1 Billion Club World Cup Prize Pool?
Explore the financial impact of the $1 billion Club World Cup prize pool on top football clubs, including Chelsea and Real Madrid.


The Club World Cup has always been a stage where the best football clubs from around the globe compete for glory. However, beyond the prestige, the tournament's $1 billion prize pool has proven to be a significant financial incentive for the participating clubs. Let's delve into how this massive sum was distributed and which clubs reaped the most benefits.
Prize Money Breakdown
The 2024 Club World Cup featured a staggering $1 billion prize pool, divided into two main categories:
-
Participation Fees: $525 million was allocated to all 32 participating clubs, with European clubs receiving higher amounts based on their sporting and commercial rankings. European clubs received between $12.81 million and $38.19 million, while clubs from other continents received fixed amounts: $15.21 million for South America, $9.55 million for North and Central America, Asia, and Africa, and $3.58 million for Oceania.
-
Performance-Based Awards: The remaining $475 million was distributed based on the clubs' performance in the tournament. Group stage victories earned clubs approximately $1.5 million, while a draw brought in $730,000.
Top Financial Performers
Chelsea emerged as the biggest financial winner, earning a total of £84 million, thanks to their triumph in the tournament. Paris Saint-Germain followed closely with £78.4 million after reaching the final. European clubs, on average, made around £39 million, while South American clubs, such as semi-finalists Fluminense, averaged £24 million.
Impact on Smaller Clubs
For smaller clubs like Auckland City, the financial rewards were transformative. The £3.3 million they earned was approximately seven times their 2024 revenue. In contrast, Real Madrid's £67 million prize money accounted for just 4% of their £901 million revenue for the same year.
Transfer Market Implications
The additional funds have allowed clubs to bolster their transfer budgets. According to UEFA regulations, clubs can spend up to 70% of their revenue on wages, transfers, and agents' fees. For instance, Chelsea's £84 million earnings covered a significant portion of their £198 million summer transfer spending, including acquisitions like Joao Pedro and Liam Delap.
Borussia Dortmund also benefited, with over 65% of their £57.9 million transfer budget being offset by their participation in the tournament. Similarly, Manchester City's £38 million earnings paid for their £31 million acquisition of Rayan Ait-Nouri from Wolves.
Expert Opinions
Football finance expert Kieran Maguire highlighted the dual-edged nature of the tournament's financial incentives. While it benefits the clubs' financial health, it also raises concerns about player welfare and competitive balance, especially in smaller leagues.
Conclusion
The Club World Cup's $1 billion prize pool has not only rewarded the best-performing clubs but also provided a financial lifeline for smaller teams. However, the long-term implications for player welfare and league competitiveness remain a topic of debate.